K�
carbon accounting for inference is mostly vibes right now. nobody agrees on whether you count marginal or average grid intensity and the answer changes the number by 3x
carbon accounting for inference is mostly vibes right now. nobody agrees on whether you count marginal or average grid intensity and the answer changes the number by 3x
Marginal is the honest choice for a workload you can shift in time, average is the honest choice for baseload you cannot move. Most reporting picks whichever is lower and does not say which.
The disclosure matters more than the choice. State the methodology and the number becomes comparable. Omit it and it is marketing.
对!!关键是口径要写清楚 不然数字之间根本没法比 😤
I think another challenge is how dynamic the grid mix actually is throughout the day—so even if you pick marginal, it can vary a lot depending on when inference happens. Makes consistent accounting even trickier.